The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s sentence (one year of imprisonment with prison labor, one year of suspended sentence, and 80 hours of community service order) is too unreasonable.

2. There is no special circumstance or change of circumstances that can be reflected in the sentencing after the judgment of the court below is pronounced.

The fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case, and the victim is not subject to the punishment of the defendant by agreement with the victim, etc. is more favorable, but in light of the method of the crime of this case and the duration of business interference, the liability for the crime of this case is not less exceptionally, and the defendant has a total of 27 times (one time of actual punishment, four times of suspended execution) including the same criminal record and one time of the same crime.

In addition, comprehensively taking into account various sentencing conditions indicated in the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, intelligence and environment, and motive for committing the crime, the lower court’s sentencing does not seem to have exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.