1. The sentence shall be suspended against Defendant A;

2. The public prosecution against Defendant B is dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A was found in the "E" where the victim D works in Ansan-si from November 13:30 to 14:10 of the same day on the same day from November 7, 2015, and A recently married and married with the defendant's birth, "the period of the birth, the same year as that of the birth, and the period of the birth, has passed" to the victim.

The victim's mobile phone business affairs were interfered with by force by preventing the victim from providing counseling to customers in an unsound manner by talking with a large voice, etc., and allowing part of the customers out of the above store.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the investigation report (CCTV image) and recording record;

1. Relevant Article 314 of the Criminal Act and Articles 314 (1) and 313 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment for a crime;

1. A fine of three million won to be suspended;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The part dismissing the prosecution under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (a) of the suspended sentence (a) of the Criminal Act (the fact that the defendant has no history of criminal punishment and the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant, the circumstances in this case,

1. Summary of this part of the facts charged

A. On November 7, 2015, Defendant A, from around 13:30 to 14:10 on the same day, was “E” in which the victim D was working for the same day, and Defendant A, even though there was no fact that the victim gave birth to the her birth with the her birth, Defendant A left the house on the 5-party job with the her birth.

By publicly pointing out false facts, "the honor of the victim was damaged by using a large voice."

B. Defendant B: (a) on October 1, 2015, the fact in the H coffee shop “A” located in Ansan-si on G was that the victim gave birth to the child before marriage; (b) even though the victim did not have given birth to the child before marriage, the victim gave birth to the Plaintiff who was given birth to the Ansan-dong hospital two to three years prior to marriage.

was stated.

The "victim" is a victim by openly pointing out false facts.