1. Attached Form;

1. The remaining amount of each real estate entered in the list, which remains after deducting the auction expenses from the proceeds thereof; and

Further to the overall purport of the pleadings in each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including paper numbers), the defendants and E are as shown in the separate sheet

1. Each of the real estate listed in the list (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”) was jointly owned (the shares of Defendant A 3/11, shares of Defendant B, C, D, and E 2/11 shares), and on October 27, 2014, the Plaintiff purchased shares of E in the compulsory auction procedure for E shares, and the Plaintiff and the Defendants currently purchased shares in the instant real estate.

2. The fact that each real estate of this case is co-owned as stated in the list. The fact that it is a house building and its site, and the defendants did not present any opinion about the partition of co-owned property of this case as to the plaintiff's claim for partition of co-owned property.

According to the above facts, it is reasonable to divide each of the real estate in the case jointly owned at the request of the plaintiff, who is co-owner of the real estate in this case. Each of the real estate in this case is a housing building and its site, which could not be divided in kind or is divided in kind in kind, and the value of each of the real estate in this case is likely to be significantly reduced, and it is reasonable to divide the remaining amount after deducting the auction proceeds from the auction proceeds in this case into