A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

Seized evidence 1, 2, and 3 shall be confiscated.

Of the facts charged of this case, the facts charged of this case are as follows.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, by posting a telephone to many and unspecified domestic persons in Korea, has them withdraw money by misrepresenting the prosecutor, prosecution investigator, staff of the Financial Supervisory Service, etc., and send a collection book.

직접 피해 자로부터 돈을 건네받는 수 법의 보이스 피 싱 조직의 일원으로, 성명 불상자는 피해자에게 전화하여 기망하는 역할, ‘D’, ‘E’ 은 수거 책에게 피해자를 만 나 금원을 교부 받을 것을 지시하는 역할, 피고 인과 성명 불상의 조직원은 중국에 있는 ‘D’, ’E‘ 등 조직원으로부터 스마트 폰 어 플 리 케이 션인 ‘ 위 챗’ 등을 통해 지시를 받아 피해자를 직접 만 나 금원을 교부 받는 수거 책 역할, F, G은 범행에 필요한 위조 문서 등을 제공하는 역할을 하기로 순차 공모하였다.

1. The Defendant and the employees of the Defendant committing the crime against the Victim H, following the above public offering, were phoneed to the victim H on October 12:21, 201 by the organization of the name influsing organization to the victim H on October 10, 2016, and the bank account opened in the name of the party was used for the crime.

A false statement was made to the effect that all the money deposited in the account was deposited in cash and sent by us to the employee of the Financial Supervisory Service.

However, the above-mentioned person was not an investigator or employee of the Public Prosecutor's Office or the Financial Supervisory Service, and was thought to obtain money from the damaged person through the Bosishing method.

The Defendant appears to have written “K coffee shop” written in the indictment of the I coffee store located in Daegu Suwon-gu, around 16:30 on the same day, to be a clerical error in “I coffee shop”.

In “The Financial Supervisory Service’s personnel conduct, and the victim was only the victim, and the victim was provided with KRW 46 million from the victim.

Accordingly, the Defendant received property by deceiving the victim in collusion with D, E, F, G and personal assistance staff.

2. The Defendant and the employees of the Defendant for the crime against the victim J are the same.