The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The sentence against the accused shall be determined by a fine of KRW 1,00,000.

The above fine shall be imposed on the defendant.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The details indicated in the document “alm” attached by the Defendant, which is a mistake of facts or misapprehension of the legal principle, are true and public interest, and even if it is not true, there is considerable reason to believe that the Defendant is true, and thus, illegality is dismissed.

Nevertheless, the lower court convicted the Defendant by misapprehending the facts or by misapprehending the legal doctrine.

B. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (the fine of KRW 2,00,000) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination on the grounds for appeal

A. According to the following circumstances acknowledged by the court below in accordance with the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below on April 22, 201, the CCTV video and video recording records, which recorded the situation of the apartment management office on April 22, 2011, the head of the management office and the head of the management office at the time, etc. did not intentionally take the Defendant’s time fees, thereby threatening the Defendant, and rather, it is evident that the Defendant was a vision by speaking and insulting the F, who is the head of the management office at the time, rather than threatening the Defendant, and rather, the Defendant was recognized as the head of the management office at the prosecution as the representative upon the Defendant’s resignation of K, who is the representative of the 101 Dong-dong election, due to personal circumstances.

In light of the fact that I voluntarily signed the meeting minutes of the election commission (10 pages) (10 pages of investigation records) on December 16, 2010, stating that “the 101 election election certificate is to be issued.” The 362 pages of investigation records) and “the 101 election commission’s 101 election commission representative from January 201 to March 3, 201 and the 101 election commission’s 10 election expenses were to be paid, the Defendant attached thereto.