The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Article 44 (2) of the Game Industry Promotion Act shall be governed by the provisions of paragraph (1).

1. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the circumstances, such as the fact that the Defendant made a confession of all of the instant crimes and reflects his mistake in depth, and that he seems to have to care for those children whose health is not good due to shooting loss, etc. in the heart, are recognized.

However, the crime of this case was committed by the defendant in collusion with C and D for the use of the game product and exchanged the result obtained through the use of the game product. It is considerably poor in the quality of the crime in light of the method and contents of the crime. The circumstances after the crime were committed by the defendant, such as having C and D make a false statement at an investigative agency in order to conceal the facts involved in the crime of this case. On October 13, 2011, the Busan District Court sentenced one year and three months of suspension of execution to the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry on October 21, 201, and sentenced two years of suspension of execution at the Busan District Court on October 21, 201 (the crime of this case was committed in this case, even though the above judgment became final, since it was committed on October 21, 201, the illegal game place business through the illegal game product was committed in this case, such as encouraging the public's gambling spirit and undermining the desire to work, and there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that may newly be considered after the judgment below.