logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2016.06.17 2016고단232
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

However, the above punishment against the Defendants for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants, while operating the “D” under the ground of the building located in the Leecheon-si, intended to arrange sexual traffic against the sex purchase remaining after employing the female sexual traffic in the name, and searching for it, Defendant B provided capital, and Defendant A conspired to take charge of the overall operation of the said telecom.

From June 3, 2015 to the end of August of the same year, the Defendants installed one set of approximately 20 square meters inside the said waiting room, and installed five inside the said waiting room, installed 120,000 won in the price of sexual traffic per man per man for sexual traffic, and installed a e-mail room in order to have a female sexual traffic, such as E, who was waiting in the said waiting room, enter the said room, and gets profits equivalent to 67,470,000 won in total during the said period by allowing the female sexual traffic to have sexual intercourse with the said room.

As a result, Defendants conspired to act as a broker for commercial sex acts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to field photographs, a detailed statement of transactions of admission and withdrawal;

1. The Defendants of the relevant criminal facts: Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively.

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants to observe protection and provide community service: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The Defendants: It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of the latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Arranging Sexual Traffic.

arrow