beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
"2015 Highest 2666"
1. On July 11, 2012, the criminal defendant against the victim C told the victim that he/she was able to know that he/she was able to know that he/she was born with his/her birth and marriage with the victim C, and that he/she was paid the victim with his/her knowledge of his/her birth and marriage. The defendant stated that "If he/she lent to the victim the money of KRW 40 million that he/she would be able to purchase the goods that he/she would be able to purchase with his/her birth and internal clothes in the South main market, he/she will pay
However, at the time, the Defendant was unable to pay the clothes operated by the Defendant, and the Defendant was retired from office due to the lack of body of the Defendant, and the Defendant’s most of the money borrowed from the victim was thought to be used as its own cost of living or hospital costs. The Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the money borrowed from the victim according to the victim’s promise, on the other hand, there was no specific property for KRW 3 million to KRW 40 million.
The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, was delivered to the post office account in the name of the Defendant in total of KRW 35 million, including KRW 30 million on the same day and KRW 5 million on the 26th of the same month.
"2015 Highest 2899"
2. Around May 2014, the Defendant against Defendant D: (a) around the street of the victim D operated by Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Dongdaemun-gu, the Defendant: (b) purchased clothes in advance; (c) lent KRW 10 million to the Defendant 10,000,000,000 won of the Party; and (d) returned back to the end of the tin; (c) at the latest, the Defendant 102 Dong 1405 Dong-dong 1405 Dong, which is currently living in Dongdaemun-gu, and (d) lent to the Defendant her belief that he/she owned in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G apartment.”
However, at the time, the defendant was not able to wear clothes in South Seodaemun, and there was no apartment owned by the defendant, and money from the victim.