logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2020.05.14 2020고단692
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 15, 2020, the Defendant interfered with business: (a) around 19:05, in D operated by the Victim C, the Defendant, the Defendant, the Defendant, under the influence of alcohol, was unable to enter the victim’s oral dispute with the Defendant located in Daegu Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, by taking advantage of the victim’s desire, such as “herman,” and “the victim,” without going through the victim’s demand, and passing through sound for about 30 minutes, without going through the said store.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's business by force.

2. At around 19:35 on the same day as indicated in paragraph (1), the Defendant received 112 report from the location described in paragraph (1) at around 19:35, stating that “the Defendant has a sound, a knife with a knife, a knife with a knife, and a knife with a knife,” and took place a disturbance within the direction F of the seat of the Daegu East East Police Station E-gu Police Station, Daegu Police Station, which called “out-of-the-face knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif,” and threatened with the above situation

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement against F and C;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of internal investigation reports (Evidence No. 6), investigation reports (Evidence No. 20) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of each fine for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant's error of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is the reason for the provisional payment order.

arrow