A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, as the believers of the victim C’s husband D, who had been in office as a pastor in his or her husband, used that he or she was known to the believers of the E commercial building as “the actual owner of the E commercial building, who has been in office as a pastor,” thereby attempting to resolve the auction problem of the above commercial building, after allowing the victims to borrow money.

On May 9, 2012, the Defendant is expected to sell the E-commercial F to the victim at the above church on May 9, 2012.

It is the actual owner of the above commercial building's 1st floor, Fho, G, Hho, I, Jho, Kho, Lho, or M, and if the monthly rent is at least KRW 1,50,000,000, the monthly rent of the above commercial building is at least KRW 1,50,000,000, the additional loan will be paid immediately after preventing the auction.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, at the time when the Defendant was bad credit holder, he was unable to repay the loans from the bank as security. On the first floor of the above commercial building, the provisional attachment decision was made on the first floor of the above commercial building, the attachment decision due to tax in arrears, the attachment decision due to the provisional attachment decision and the attachment decision due to the tax in arrears, M was issued, and the auction decision was made on the above commercial building K and L were not returned to the lessee, and there was no intention or ability to repay the above loans from the damaged party, such as the lessee's failure to return the deposit amount of KRW 180 million.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received from the injured party on the same day a total of KRW 120 million, KRW 30 million around May 10, 2012, and KRW 150 million.

The Defendant received a total of KRW 240,000,000 from the damaged party on six occasions from January 26, 2012 to October 23, 2012, a total of KRW 240,000,00 from the damaged party, as indicated in the list of crimes in attached Form.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Recording of each part of the statement by a witness C among the trial records at the third and fourth public trial records;

1. Each of the defendants;