The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds of appeal is that the instant crime committed by the Defendant, while driving a car on which the Defendant did not purchase mandatory insurance, neglected his duty of front-time watching and neglecting his duty of care, and caused the injury of the Defendant to the right-hand upper part of pulverization that requires treatment for about 8 weeks due to the shock of the victim C, and that the instant case is not less complicated, and that the Defendant did not agree with the victim until now. In light of the above, the sentence (two years of suspended sentence in six months of imprisonment) sentenced by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the judgment prosecutor, considering the following: (a) the Defendant confessions and reflects the Defendant; (b) the victim’s negligence on the crosswalks for pedestrian suspension has contributed to the occurrence of the instant traffic accident; and (c) the Defendant has no other penalty force other than the past fines once; and (d) the Defendant’s character, conduct and environment; (b) the background and consequence of the instant crime; and (c) the circumstances after the commission of the instant crime, etc., and the conditions of sentencing as shown in the arguments and arguments, it cannot be deemed that the sentence imposed by the court below is unreasonable

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.