The judgment below

Of them, the part on Defendant B shall be reversed.

Defendant

B A person shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Defendant

A.

The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because each of the punishments (two years of suspended execution in August, and three years of suspended execution in one year of imprisonment) that the court below sentenced the Defendants to the Defendants is too unfasible.

Defendant

A Fact-misunderstanding Defendant A, not by conspiracy with Defendant B, committed each of the crimes of this case independently.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which judged that Defendant A committed each of the crimes of this case in collusion with Defendant B was erroneous, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

The above-mentioned sentence that the court below committed against Defendant A is too unfair.

Defendant

B Fact-misunderstanding Defendant A independently operated the gas station of this case, and committed each of the crimes of this case.

Defendant

B was an assistance in maintaining the customer of the instant gas station for Defendant A, who is the Republic of Korea, and did not commit each of the instant crimes in collusion with Defendant A.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below convicting each of the facts charged of this case is erroneous by misunderstanding the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

The above punishment that the court below committed against Defendant B is too unreasonable.

Judgment

The defendants asserted that the facts of the defendants are erroneous as alleged above in the judgment below, and the court below rejected the above assertion in detail by explaining the judgment in detail. In light of the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the court below, the judgment of the court below is justified, and therefore, the defendants' assertion of mistake is without merit.

Defendant

It is recognized that there is no record that Defendant A has been punished for the same kind of crime and that there is no record of punishment exceeding the fine, and that the instant fraud crime is committed for attempted crimes.

On the other hand, the crime of selling fake oil in this case is an environmental pollution and automobile performance.