1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, and this case is cited by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except where the relevant part of the judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

on the 4th 9th 9th 6th 6th 9th 6th 9th 6th 6th 6th 6th 8, and 9th 9th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 9

Part 5, 10 "Maintenance Period Facilities" shall be improved to "Maintenance Infrastructure".

The 6th 7-8th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 2000 square meters of the existing site area is a religious site and the remainder is a site used as a church parking lot, and the external large church appearance is a typical large church. The Plaintiff church is a type 2 neighborhood living facility under the Building Act, while the 500th m2th 50 square meters of the total floor area is a religious facility under the Building Act. On the other hand, the Defendant determined that the Plaintiff’s instant land is included in the road and the connected green belt development area, and the F church did not belong to such restricted area, and decided to maintain the F church at the present location to reduce the financial burden of its members.”

2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.