logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2013.07.17 2013고단582
영유아보육법위반
Text

Defendant

A, B, and C shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,00,000, and Defendant D shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,00, respectively.

The defendants are the defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendant A from February 2, 2008 to February 2, 2008, is a person who is in charge of the head of "I child care center" which is an individual private child care facility in the first floor of Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and a person who establishes and operates a child care center shall not collect child care fees and other necessary expenses from the person who uses the child care center by fraud or other improper means.

From January 201 to November 201, the Defendant notified the aforementioned childcare center of KRW 110,00 for each month in the course of receiving special activity expenses from guardians, KRW 110,00 for each year in 201, KRW 120,00 for each year in the course of receiving special activity expenses from guardians, and KRW 50,000 for each item in English, KRW 50,000 for each item in Korean, and KRW 10,00 for science.

However, the Defendant entered into a contract to pay the amount of about 20 to 50% of the amount notified to guardians each month, regardless of the number of infants and English and scientific activity enterprises, and at the same time, the amount deposited in excess of the educational expenses agreed to be paid each month by the Defendant to the above special activity enterprise and the total amount of the teaching materials deposited in K, which is the teaching materials enterprise, is again agreed to be returned to L’s account (National Bank M) and N’s account (National BankO), which is the head of the Defendant, and thus, the special activity expenses paid by the guardian are not actually used as the total amount of the teaching materials for special activity and the total amount of the teaching materials paid by the guardian, but the Defendant was a plan to return most of them to use them at will.

Nevertheless, the defendant does not settle the fact that he will receive money from the special activity company as above from the guardian and does not return the special activity expenses that he received from the special activity company to the guardian.

arrow