1. The defendant shall pay 106,962,366 won to the plaintiff Cho Man-ri Co., Ltd. and the plaintiff Lee Dong-ri Co., Ltd. 295,527.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiffs are companies engaged in the glass processing and manufacturing business, and the defendant is the Korean glass agency, a glass manufacturing company.

The defendant has traded in supply of double-story glass, etc., which is necessary for the construction work of apartment houses, etc. (hereinafter referred to as "Gyeongsan enterprise", and both the plaintiffs' marking corporation are omitted) and Gyeongsan enterprise to perform the construction work. The defendant has delivered an order to the plaintiffs as to the part of multi-story glass processing, and if he has received an order designating the size, number, etc. of multi-story glass, etc. to be used in the original construction work from Gyeongsan enterprise, the defendant traded by directly sending the order to the plaintiffs as ordered by Gyeongsan enterprise to the plaintiffs who are in charge of the processing business by processing the glass glass which the plaintiffs sent to the plaintiffs in advance as ordered by Gyeongsan enterprise.

B. The Plaintiffs received direct payment of processing costs from the Defendant from the Defendant until March 2015. However, at the Defendant’s request, the part of the glass processing costs directly supplied from the Defendant to the workplace site of the light industry was separated and issued a tax invoice in the future of the light industry. Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s interest rate was the transaction portion from August 2015 to February 2016, and the transaction portion from March 2015 to October 2015, the Plaintiff’s interest rate was the Plaintiff’s interest rate was the Plaintiff’s interest rate directly issued the tax invoice in the future of each light industry and received the bill equivalent to the processing costs from the light industry.

(B) Since November 2015, the general interest rate for plaintiffs 1 and 208 was the first issue of a tax invoice to the defendant on the grounds that the Gyeongsan company did not pay the price.

Around February 2016, the Gyeongsan company was insolvent, and the defendant, who was the main trading office of the Gyeongsan company, was also in fact closed and discontinued transactions with the plaintiffs. D.

Plaintiff

The club interest and the transaction relation with the defendant shall be incurred.