A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. At night, around 22:00 on May 4, 2014, the Defendant: (a) opened and intruded a window that was not corrected in the “D” office operated by the victim C at the East Sea; and (b) cut off the property worth approximately KRW 500,000 in the market price of Samsung C’s main body of Samsung CPC, approximately KRW 30,000, and approximately KRW 80,000 in the market price.

2. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall operate any automobile on a road which is not covered by the mandatory insurance of automobile;

Nevertheless, at around 15:00 on September 21, 2013, the Defendant driven 362 Korean Steel Corporation's parking lot in Nam-gu, South-gu, South-gu, 16:00 on September 21, 2013 in the condition that he did not purchase a mandatory insurance policy, and driven 6 times in Do as shown in the annexed list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Data on current status of automobile mandatory insurance purchases;

1. 4 copies printed out of the screen for the management of unmanned control data, and copies printed out of the screen for automatic search system of hand-on vehicles; and

1. Application of investigation report (verification of details of operation without mandatory insurance for motor vehicles) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Articles 30 and 330 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Articles 46 (2) 2 and 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act (the operation of automobiles which are not mandatory insurance, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the fact that the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant as a result of an agreement with the victim of night structure intrusion theft) or more of the Criminal Act (the fact that the defendant is against the depth of the crime of this case, etc.)