All appeals filed by the Defendants and the Prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence (unfair punishment) imposed by the lower court on the Defendants (one and half years of imprisonment with prison labor for Defendants A, one year of imprisonment with prison labor for Defendants B, and four months of imprisonment with prison labor for Defendants C) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the court below on Defendant B and Defendant C is too unfased and unreasonable.

2. Determination on the grounds for appeal

A. We examine the Defendant A’s assertion of unfair sentencing, and consider the following: (a) Defendant A’s perception of all of the instant offenses; and (b) Defendant A’s in depth divided his mistake; and (c) Defendant A’s infinite growth environment appears to have caused each of the instant offenses; and (d) Defendant A’s age is still not only the age but also the mother is not overfinite, but also the mother is able to live in good faith.

However, Defendant A had a record of having been subject to a protective disposition several times for the same crime, and committed the crime of special larceny 10 times with the J and the 10th day, etc., which is a juvenile, and used the stolen credit card as entertainment expenses, etc. as well as the theft of cash and credit cards, and used the stolen credit card as part of the damage, but did not reach an agreement with the victims. The lower court has already determined the sentence in consideration of the circumstances favorable to Defendant A, and there was no special change in the circumstances or circumstances that may be considered newly after the sentence of the lower judgment, and there was no change in the circumstances or circumstances that may be considered newly after the sentence of the lower judgment, and all other circumstances that form the conditions for the sentencing as shown in the arguments and the records of the instant case, including the Defendant A’s age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., even if the Defendant asserted as the grounds for appeal by Defendant A, it cannot be deemed unfair because it is too unreasonable to the extent that the

Therefore, Defendant A’s assertion is justified.