logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2018.11.23 2018고단1799
전자금융거래법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around March 2016, the Defendant violated the Electronic Financial Transactions Act established a legal entity with the trade name called “limited company D,” after hearing the horses that “a company may obtain a loan if it is incorporated under the name of the company” from the head of the Tong recruitment book with which the name he/she became aware of through the Internet site search is unknown.

On April 8, 2016, the Defendant issued a proposal to the effect that “The Defendant would open an account under the name of the company and offer KRW 80 to 10 million per a week account.” On April 8, 2016, the Defendant opened two accounts in the name of the said legal entity at a national bank located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City, in the name of the said legal entity, and transferred the access media by issuing the passbook, cash card, and OTP card connected to each of the above accounts to the above recruitment books in the Nam-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City, and informing the password.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Telecommunications Business Act committed an attempt to open a mobile phone in the name of the Defendant and sell it to others. On August 8, 2016, the Defendant concluded a mobile phone service contract with SK Telecom, which is a telecommunications business operator, and opened the mobile phone (USIM) chip from the mobile phone at the above mobile phone, and sold the same amount of 20,000 won to a person whose name was known through the Internet search of the above core chip in the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, and then sold the core chip to the mobile phone from September 6, 2016 until September 6, 2016 after opening the mobile phone four times as indicated in the list of crimes, and sold the relevant core chip to each recipient, thereby inserting the relevant core chip into the phone machine, thereby enabling him to use the mobile phone number subscribed to the Defendant’s name.

Accordingly, the defendant provided telecommunications services provided by telecommunications business operators for the purpose of telecommunications.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The investigation report (oil) shall be filed.

arrow