logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.05.10 2017나81557
청구이의
Text

1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

A notary public of the defendant against the plaintiff is a law firm Hanma.

Reasons

1. On January 15, 2013, the plaintiff's husband C received 70 million won interest from the defendant on 15, 2013 (payment on February 15, 2013) 30% per annum, 30% per annum, 15 April 15, 2013 (hereinafter "the loan money of this case"), and received a notarial deed recognizing compulsory execution from a notary public (hereinafter "notarial deed of this case") as stated in paragraph 1 above (hereinafter "the notarial deed of this case"), and (2) around that time, the plaintiff (or "the plaintiff" without distinction between the plaintiff C and C, 201, 300 won, 300 won per annum, 400 won per annum, 300 won per annum, 400 won per annum, 200 won per annum, 305 won per annum, 300 million won per annum, 300 million won per annum, 400 million won per annum, 2013.

arrow