logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1968. 7. 31. 선고 68누41 판결
[개간준공일취소][집16(2)행,043]
Main Issues

Whether registration of land cadastre can be subject to administrative litigation

Summary of Judgment

An act of recording certain matters on the land cadastre is intended to be considered as data for convenience in the execution of administrative affairs and certification of facts, and it does not come into effect because any right is granted, changed or lost due to registration, and even if there is a statement different from the actual one, the act of recording is not subject to administrative litigation.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 1 of the Administrative Litigation Act

Plaintiff-Appellant

Park Jong-chul

Defendant-Appellee

The head of Yeongdeungpo-gu

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 68Gu43 delivered on March 14, 1968

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal by the Plaintiff’s attorney are examined;

It is essential to register certain matters on the land cadastre as data for convenience in the execution of administrative affairs and certification of facts, and it does not take effect of any right granted, change, or loss due to the registration. Thus, even if the entry on the date of completion of the reclamation of the novel is entered differently from the actual one, such as the family litigation theory, it cannot be said that there is any change in the relation of the plaintiff's right. In other words, it is reasonable that the court below determined that the act of recording on the land cadastre of this case cannot be subject to administrative litigation as the above purport, that is, there is no reason to attack the original judgment as an opposing opinion.

Therefore, it is so decided as per Disposition with the assent of all participating Justices.

Supreme Court Judge Lee Young-subop (Presiding Judge)

arrow
기타문서