logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원고등법원 2019.10.23 2019나11384
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition as follows. Thus, it is accepted by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil

The 5th 7th 7th 'Public Works Act' is regarded as "Land Compensation Act."

Part 8. The following shall be added to the 12th page:

Article 91(1) of the former Land Compensation Act provides that “Any person may repurchase the relevant land within one year from the time all or part of the relevant land becomes unnecessary or within ten years from the date of its acquisition,” the meaning of Article 91(1) of the same Act shall be construed as exercising the right to repurchase within one year from the time of acquisition if the relevant land becomes unnecessary within ten years from the date of acquisition, and where ten years have not elapsed from the date of acquisition, the right to repurchase may exercise the right to repurchase within ten years from the date of acquisition if the land becomes unnecessary (see Supreme Court Decision 2010Da30782, Sept. 30, 2010).”

2. Conclusion, the first instance judgment is justifiable, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed.

arrow