logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.10.15 2015고정1742
자동차손해배상보장법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Although the Defendant, as a holder of CDap Motor Vehicle, is prohibited from operating a motor vehicle on the road, which is not covered by mandatory insurance, on February 9, 2013, the Defendant operated the said motor vehicle on February 14, 2013, at the entrance (Tunket) at the entrance (Tun), the Gangwon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gangwon-do, Gangwon-do, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, on February 14, 2013, when the mandatory insurance contract term of the motor vehicle was terminated, and was discovered on April 11, 2015, as indicated in the attached list of crimes in the attached list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Investigation report (report on listening to telephone statements);

1. A detailed statement of insurance coverage;

1. Application of the register of automobiles statutes

1. Article 46(2)2 of the former Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act (amended by Act No. 12987, Jan. 6, 2015); the main text of Article 8 (Attached Table Nos. 1 through 136; hereinafter referred to as the “Attached Table”); each of the provisions of Article 46(2)2 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act; and the main text of Article 8 (Attached Table No. 137 through 170; hereinafter referred to as the “Attached Table”); each of the provisions of Article 46(2)2 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act; and each of

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order shall be determined as follows: (a) partially reducing the amount of fine specified in the summary order by taking into account the fact that the defendant recognized his mistake and reflects the defendant's mistake; (b) there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime; (c) the vehicle in the judgment does not pose a risk of reoffending due to the public sale; (d) the defendant's health

arrow