logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.07.18 2016가단5118250
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a company established for the purpose of cable manufacturing business, and the Defendant is a company established for the purpose of providing goods verification and test services, including inspection of exported and imported goods in the Republic of Korea.

나. 원고는 인도 소재 회사인 JMV LPS Ltd.로부터 위 회사가 제작한 전선(Cu CD 70㎟ Cable 6,892m, Cu CD 10㎟ Cable 1,552m, 이하 ‘이 사건 전선’이라 한다)을 수입하기로 하고, 2015. 8.경 피고에게 위 전선에 대한 품질검사를 의뢰한 후 그 비용으로 1,042,888원을 지급하였다.

C. From September 7, 2015 to September 8, 2015, the Defendant conducted the quality inspection of the instant electric wires through the SGS India Limited Liability Company located in India, concluded that it conforms to the standards for specifications provided by the Plaintiff, and notified the Plaintiff.

원고는 2015. 6. 19. 한국철도공사와 물품구매계약을 체결하였고, 이에 따라 한국철도공사에게 공급하기 위하여 이 사건 전선을 매수하여 납품하였으나, 한국철도공사는 2016. 2. 26. 원고에게 이 사건 전선 중 70㎟ 규격의 전선에 요구되는 위 계약상 인장하중(강도) 수치를 만족시키지 못하였다는 이유로 검사불합격통지를 하였다.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Gap evidence 3-1 to 4, Gap evidence 8-1, 2, Gap evidence 9, Eul evidence 2 and 3, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Although the Plaintiff’s assertion of this case’s electric wire does not meet the requirements requested by the Plaintiff, the Defendant did not conduct an inspection of the said electric wire and notified the Plaintiff that it is appropriate for the Plaintiff.

The Plaintiff incurred a total of KRW 266,689,705, such as reliance on the Defendant’s wrong inspection result and paying the price for the goods to the company located in India, and thus, the Defendant incurred a total of KRW 100,000,100 as part of the damages caused by the said nonperformance.

arrow