logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산고등법원 (창원) 2018.08.30 2018나11315
선금 반환
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, except for the following addition of the determination of a new argument made by the defendant in this court or a new argument made by the defendant in this court, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

2. "Partial testimony of A by a witness" of the fourth 3rd of the judgment of the court of first instance.

3. The addition;

A. The defendant's arguments are as follows: (a) 50,000 foreign-capital invested company's preliminary survey on the current status of buildings adjacent to the Korea Construction Safety Technology Institute at 2,750,000 foreign-capital invested companies; (b) 115,80,500 material cost B's wage overall director's pay for 10,000 labor cost and 50% of the work cost per four months; and (c) 8,000,000 wages and 2,000,000 labor cost and 350,60,000 won under the contract of the National Tax Service at 350,000 won and 622,60,000 won and 36,000,000 won and 36,005,000 won and 26,007,000 won and 26,007,000 won and 267,000 won and 267,07,067,27.

B. However, it is not sufficient to acknowledge that the Defendant spent each of the above amounts for the instant construction only with the descriptions of the evidence Nos. 1 through 15 (including the branch numbers where there are branch numbers), and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise.

Even if the Defendant assumed that each of the above amounts was paid, the benefits that would be derived from the performance of the contract, i.e., compensation for the performance of the contract.

arrow