beta
Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. Around March 17:53, 2002, when the Defendant, an employee of the Defendant, operates the B truck owned by the Defendant with respect to the Defendant’s business, the Defendant violated the restriction on the operation of vehicles by each road management authority by operating the said vehicle on the 17 line located in the National Highway 17, which is located in the superior of the former National Road of Yannam-gun, the 2:18 tons (in excess of 1.18 tons) on April 26, 2002.
[2013rd group120] On January 28, 2004, the Defendant violated the restriction on vehicle operation by the road management authority, as the Defendant’s employees, in relation to the Defendant’s business at the front of the Doksan Business Office located in the direction of Seoul, the 185 km-nam Line: (a) around January 28, 2004, as well as D25 tons of the Defendant’s business and the total weight of the car trucks exceeding 4.6
[2013 Highest 121] On August 26, 2003, the Defendant violated the restriction on the vehicle operation of the road management authority by C, who is an employee of the Defendant, on the front of the Dong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Office, at a point of 361.5 km of the Central Expressway 361.5 km, in relation to the Defendant’s business, by operating more than 40 tons of the total weight of freight truck owned by the Defendant.
[2] On February 20, 2004, at around 18:56, the Defendant violated the restriction on the operation of the vehicle by the road management authority by operating the vehicle by exceeding the stable weight of the B truck owned by the Defendant (Article 2.1.04 tons and over 0.4 tons, respectively) with respect to the Defendant’s business on the 17th line of the national highway located in Kucheon-si, in the document of Kucheon-si, the Defendant, an employee of the Defendant, as an employee of the Defendant.
[2013 Highest 123] On June 4, 2002, the Defendant violated the restriction on vehicle operation of the road management authority by: (a) Party C, an employee of the Defendant, on the street in front of the Korea Highway Corporation at a point 342.7 km of the Bridge 3,000, in relation to the Defendant’s duties; (b) Party C, an employee of the Defendant, on the street, exceeded the minimum weight of D trucks owned by the Defendant (at least 1.
2. As to each of the facts charged in this case, the judgment prosecutor.