logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2019.01.30 2017고단2527
병역법위반
Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

1. On August 31, 2017, the Defendant was directly given a notice of enlistment in active duty service under the name of the director of the regional military manpower office in the Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-si, and the Defendant’s house located in the Defendant’s house located in Chungcheongnam-gu, Cheongju, B apartment, and C, and the Defendant’s house located in the Defendant’s house located in Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, and Da, and did not enlist without justifiable grounds, by the date three days have elapsed from the date of enlistment.

2. Determination

A. The so-called conscientious objection and so-called conscientious objection according to relevant legal doctrine and conscience refer to refusing to perform the duty of military service accompanied by gathering guns or military training on the grounds of conscientious decision formed in religious, ethical, philosophical, or other similar motives.

It is not reasonable in light of the constitutional system of guaranteeing fundamental rights, including the freedom of conscience, and the overall legal order, and also violates the spirit of free democracy such as tolerance and tolerance of minority objectors.

Therefore, if a genuine conscience is to be conscientious objection, such objection constitutes “justifiable cause” under Article 88(1) of the Military Service Act.

(See Supreme Court en banc Decision 2016Do10912 Decided November 1, 2018).B.

In accordance with the record, ① the Defendant’s active duty service enlistment notice was given on August 31, 2017, and the Defendant expressed his will to refuse enlistment in the military and active duty service from the investigative agency under the religious faith to this court, under the influence of his mother, and the Defendant was engaged in sexual intercourse and volunteer service under the influence of her mother. In the first year of high school of 17 years old, the Defendant was in her religious organization E, and up to now her religious organization E.

arrow