logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2019.06.19 2018구단22374
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of a decision not to recognize refugee status;

A. The first application for refugee status: ① The Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on September 7, 2012 with the short-term visit (C-3) sojourn status on the short-term visit (C-4) on the part of C-didiarian State, and on October 5, 2012, the Plaintiff was a member of a young organization of D-party (D and D), a political party supporting the former president, and the Plaintiff was also a member of D-party (D). The Plaintiff was arrested after the arrest of the former president, and died during the arrest of his father and punishment, and the Plaintiff was arrested, and the Plaintiff was released as bail. In the event the Plaintiff returned to C-diararar, the Plaintiff may be arrested and killed as an adviser or killed.”

② On May 19, 2014, the Defendant rendered a decision to recognize the refugee status against the Plaintiff. Accordingly, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice, but the Minister of Justice dismissed the Plaintiff’s objection on April 2, 2015.

③ The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit (Seoul Administrative Court 2015Gudan5309), but was sentenced to a dismissal ruling on October 8, 2015, and both the Plaintiff’s appeal (Seoul High Court 2015Nu66396) and the final appeal (Supreme Court 2016Du49341) were dismissed, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 29, 2016.

B. On December 27, 2016, 201, after the decision became final and conclusive, the Plaintiff filed an application for recognition of refugee status in the instant case with the following reasons: (a) on December 27, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application for recognition of refugee status with the Defendant on the ground that “the Plaintiff may also be killed if he/she returned to Korea because he/she was threatened by telephone from the

② On January 19, 2018, the Defendant rendered a decision to deny refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that “it is difficult to deem that the Plaintiff satisfied the requirements for refugee status under the Refugee Act.”

③ Although the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice, the Minister of Justice dismissed the Plaintiff’s objection on September 14, 2018.

[Reasons for Recognition] A. A. Articles 1 through 3, 1 through 3.

arrow