The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentencing of the lower court (a fine of eight million won) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is divided into the defendant's wrong facts, and the fact that there is no same criminal records of the same kind, but the court below already determined the amount of fine in consideration of all such circumstances, and there is a need to strictly punish credit business operators who receive interest on the registration of credit business, etc. and the protection of finance users in the legislative intent of the Act on the Protection of Finance Users in order to protect the finance users and stabilize the economic life of the people. There is no special circumstance or circumstance that may be newly considered in sentencing after the decision of the court below, and there is no change in the circumstances or circumstances that may newly consider sentencing after the decision of the court below, and there are other various sentencing conditions such as the defendant's age, environment, motive for crimes, circumstances after crimes, and criminal records, it is difficult to view that the defendant's sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable

3. Accordingly, the appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.