The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

In light of the evidence duly admitted by the court below, the court below's determination that all of the charges of this case is guilty is just and there is no error of law by misunderstanding facts or failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations in violation of logical and empirical rules.

Meanwhile, according to the records, the defendant appealed against the judgment of the court of first instance and asserted only mistake of facts and unreasonable sentencing as the grounds for appeal. In such a case, the argument that the judgment of the court below did not recognize mental and physical disability is not a legitimate ground for appeal.

In addition, the argument in the grounds of appeal concerning the conditions of sentencing is the argument of unfair sentencing, and under Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in the case where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years is imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, the above argument in this case where the defendant was sentenced to more minor punishment is not a legitimate ground

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.