A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 7, 2019, at around 22:30 on November 22, 2019, the Defendant interfered with business: (a) heard the victim’s business while drinking alcohol in the “D cafeteria” operated by the victim C (n, 56 years of age) located in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; (b) he heard the end of the business from the victim; (c) and (d) made a cigarette smoking in the said cafeteria; and (d) the victim resisted the victim’s business for about 20 minutes, including but not limited to B.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the business of the victim's restaurant by force.

2. On November 7, 2019, the Defendant was forced to return home from F, a police officer of the Seoul Dobong Police Station E (a police box) who received and called the notification at the same place as the preceding paragraph on November 22:43, 2019, and was forced to take a bath to the above F, and the Defendant was able to take a bath to the said F. The Defendant was her mother.

D. There were assaulting, i.e., that multiple gue is prevented from baring, that gue is “the bar bar bar bar bar,” and that the table bucks in front of the above F would be cut off with the above F F F’s bucks.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to F and C;

1. Each statement of G, H and I;

1. Application of each investigation report (Attachment of photographs and photographs of the damage caused by the obstruction of performance of official duties, and attachment of external and external photographs of the "Dcafeteria" which is the scene of the crime

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act is deemed to interfere with duties and interfere with police officers’ performance of official duties, and there is no good character of the crime, and the defendant has been punished several times for obstruction of performance of official duties.