logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2013.08.13 2013고단674
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

The prosecutor is also sentenced to forfeiture of No. 1 of the evidence, but this is also.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Judgment of the court below]

1. When the Defendant receives money from a telephone loan fraud group consisting of brailles, such as inducements, total withdrawals, withdrawals managements, and withdrawals, which is a member of the telephone loan fraud group, and if the printed inducements by telephone call to unspecified persons and then transfers money first to unspecified persons, the Defendant and E, who are the withdrawals books, in accordance with D’s instructions, shall withdraw the money and deliver it to D. D, and D, in sequence, conspired with F, F, D, E, etc. to acquire money by means of re-delivery of the money to F.

On November 2012, 2012, the Non-name inducement policy was carried out as if the victim G was a counselor for Hyundai Capital diversing by telephoneing the phone to the victim G at a non-place, and the victim G said that “the prior interest and the six-month amount should be first paid to the victim G for the loan of KRW 25 million. When the loan was granted, the five-month interest should be refunded at the time of the loan, and the computer work should be carried out, and the six-month interest should be deposited in the order of the other accounts.

In fact, however, even if the above incentive was remitted from the victim, there was no intention or ability to provide the victim with the loan.

Nevertheless, on November 21, 2012, the above inducement book, as seen above, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 880,000 from the victim with a new bank account in the name of H as a loan interest, from the victim, from that time until December 5, 2012, and received a total of KRW 8,564,00 from that time to December 5, 2012, and Defendant and E, in accordance with D’s instructions, withdrawn the money remitted from the victim and then deliver it to D, and the F returned it again to the superior officer.

Accordingly, the defendant's name-free boxes, F, D, E.

arrow