The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Although the Defendant did not mislead the victim as stated in the facts charged, the lower court convicted the Defendant of mistake of facts or misapprehension of legal doctrine.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (one year of suspended sentence for six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. In full view of the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below and the court below as to the assertion of mistake of facts or misapprehension of legal principles, the court below is justified in finding the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case for the reasons stated in its holding, and there is no error of mistake of facts or misapprehension of legal principles as alleged by

B. In the lower court’s decision on the assertion of unfair sentencing, the name and title of the vehicle was transferred to another person; the fact that the withdrawal of a complaint was submitted by agreement with the victim is favorable to the defendant; the Defendant has a substantial penalty power due to a similar type of fraud; the Defendant has not fulfilled his/her promise with the victim for a long time; and the Defendant has again agreed with the victim after the victim’s criminal complaint, but did not comply with the due date; and on March 10, 2016, he/she completed the registration of transfer of the vehicle that ought to reach the date of the victim’s testimony at the lower court on March 10, 2016; and the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, background and consequence of the instant crime; and all other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing specified in the records and pleadings, such as the circumstances after the crime

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.