1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On November 1, 2010, the Plaintiff was on the part of the Army superior officer (the first entry date was September 17, 1990) and served as the Chief of the Telecommunications Station for the Army Team Cand the Headquarters of the Army Team from November 29, 2010.

B. On the grounds that the Plaintiff was subject to a minor disciplinary measure twice as described in paragraphs (1) and (2) below (hereinafter “instant disciplinary measure”), the Plaintiff was ordered to discharge from active service on the ground that the Plaintiff was determined to be unfit for active service. In full view of the facts of the above disciplinary measure and the opinions of the commander as described in paragraphs (3) and (4), the Investigation Committee of the Persons with the Dual Dual Dual Dual Dual Dual Dual Dual Dual Dual Dual and the Army Headquarters Review Committee on July 9, 2015, and on July 21, 2015, the Defendant issued a discharge order from active service on the ground that “the Plaintiff constitutes a person who is unfit for active service as defined in Article 56(3)1 of the Enforcement Rule of the Military Personnel Management Act (a person who is not responsible

(2) On March 16, 2015, around 04:30, 2015, in relation to the use of the cost of maintaining non-distribution of telecommunications equipment and materials by a failure to closely check and supervise the use of telecommunications equipment and materials in the book book from July 5, 2014 to December 12, 2015, resulting in an act contrary to the accounting guidelines, such as the first payment of goods without receiving the goods from the book book book by approving the relevant public documents, etc.; 2) on April 28, 2015, the duty of faithfully performing the duty of care (limited to the duty of care) and the duty of care (limited to the duty of care) on March 16, 2015, the duty of care for the first time, which was prepared to work in the book book of the central office of the central office of the central office of the central office of the employees, but the duty of care for the Plaintiff’s main office of the online game at issue.