Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,200,00.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant of Daejeon Tae-gu

B. A person operating “C” in subparagraph 202.

The owner or user of a private-use truck shall not provide or lease such private-use truck commercially for transport of cargo.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, on February 7, 2017, moved from Daejeon D Apartment 6, 305 to two apartments, around 10:10 on February 7, 2017, and transported to receive KRW 1,200,000,00 using a private truck, a private truck, other than a commercial vehicle, to receive KRW 50,00,00,00 from a private truck.

Accordingly, the defendant provided private-use trucks for cargo transport at a cost.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement;

1. An explanatory note;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 67 subparagraph 7 and 56 of the Trucking Transport Business Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant asserts that the judgment on the Defendant’s argument regarding Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order only provides the sloping vehicles, which were decided free of charge, for the transportation of cargo, and not for the provision of compensation.

According to evidence, the defendant received KRW 1,200,00 from G in return for the transportation of cargo, and used a commercial truck and a E-bridge registered as a private-use truck, to move the object.

According to the facts of the above recognition, the above bridge is used to transport the article in addition to the truck for business, and as long as the defendant received the transportation cost of the article, it cannot be deemed that the above bridge is provided for the transportation of the article without compensation.

Therefore, we cannot accept the defendant's above assertion.