A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

The defendant's disclosure information is made through the information and communication network for a period of three years.

Criminal facts

On May 16, 2015, the defendant and the person who requested an attachment order (hereinafter referred to as "defendant") issued a summary order of KRW 2 million as a crime of forced indecent act committed in accordance with the Suwon Franchisive Support, and on September 20, 2006, the Seoul Western District Court was sentenced to a fine of KRW 4 million as a crime of forced indecent act. On July 13, 2011, the Seoul Western District Court was sentenced to a suspended sentence of KRW 8 months as a crime of forced indecent act committed by the Seoul Western District Court. On November 26, 2015, the sentence was completely executed on May 19, 201.

[2] On February 16, 2017, around 03:38, the Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim E (the victim 23 years old) who was locked at the 4th floor of “D” in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government’s public resting room for men and women in the middle-gu, Seoul, with the victim’s her butt will bring about the victim’s sexual part on the part of the Defendant.

[The facts constituting the ground for requesting an attachment order] The Defendant is found to have committed a sexual crime on at least two occasions, including the facts constituting the offense indicated in the judgment, and is likely to recommit a sexual crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. G statements;

1. A investigation report (CCTV image data and telephone call from a witness);

1. Previous convictions indicated in the judgment: A response to inquiries, such as criminal history, investigation report (a report attached to the same type of force, and a repeated crime during the period);

1. The risk of recidivism of sexual crime as indicated in the judgment: (a) the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence and the written investigation before the claim, i.e., the Defendant had multiple same criminal records as indicated in the judgment, and the instant crime constitutes repeated crimes; (b) the Defendant’s previous criminal records and the instant crime committed indecent acts against young women who were committed during sobry or soup; and (c) the Defendant has repeatedly committed the same veterinary act against many and unspecified persons; and (d) the risk of the Defendant’s Korean sexual crime against the Defendant.