1. The Defendant’s KRW 9,461,508 with respect to the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from June 2, 2018 to August 23, 2019.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. 1) On June 23, 1984, the Plaintiff is the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C large 149 square meters (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s land”).

(A) A building with the first and fourth floors above the ground on the ground completed the registration of ownership transfer, and around July 22, 191, on the ground of the above land (hereinafter “Plaintiff building”).

(2) On March 30, 1993, the registration of ownership transfer was completed under the name of the Defendant on November 5, 2002 under the name of the Plaintiff on August 5, 2002, when the registration of ownership transfer was completed on the land of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul (hereinafter “Defendant’s land”) with respect to the land of the Plaintiff on the land of Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul (hereinafter “Defendant’s land”). The registration of ownership transfer was completed on October 5, 2002 under the Defendant’s name.

On June 20, 2017, the Defendant donated 32/100 of each of the Defendant’s land to F and G, the husband of which is F and G, and completed the registration of ownership transfer for each of the aforementioned donations on July 28, 2017, with respect to F and G’s shares on July 28, 2017.

3) When the previous fence installed on the boundary of the Plaintiff’s land and the Defendant’s land was damaged in the course of constructing the Plaintiff’s building, the Plaintiff’s fenced the Plaintiff’s land and the Defendant’s land (hereinafter “instant fence”).

A) A new installation of the fence was made, and part of the fenced part of the fenced part of the part on the part of the Defendant’s land (hereinafter “the part on the dispute of this case”) connected to each of the items in the separate sheet Nos. 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 3, 200

(B) Around August 2017, the Defendant started construction work of constructing a new building on the Defendant’s land with the size of the first and eighth floors above the ground (hereinafter “new construction work of this case”) and thereafter completed the construction work, but failed to undergo a completion inspection.

2) In the process of the new construction of this case, part of the wall of this case was destroyed, and the Plaintiff, via the head of the site office of the new construction of this case, shall perform the repair work of the part of the damage (hereinafter referred to as the “instant execution note”) as follows.

of this case. The Corporation received the unmanned

Property was damaged due to the destruction of the fence, etc. that occurred during the new construction of this case.