logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2019.01.17 2018고단2804
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 00:40 on June 10, 2018, the Defendant, in front of the Sungsi-si B apartment zone in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, and the Defendant left the above apartment zone, and the Defendant’s left arms faced with the victim’s upper arms, and entered the direction of the victim’s dwelling, following the passage of the victim’s back to the front corridor of the said apartment E-head of the said apartment site in which the victim’s dwelling is located, and intrudes into the victim’s apartment corridor, which is a residence, by dividing the first race of the victim’s dwelling.

2. The Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act from 01:30 on the same day to 01:50 on the same day, to 01:0, the Defendant added F to F at a place less than approximately 2 meters away from F, which divided the friendship and talks, and as F, as F moves to the convenience store for the damaged place, the Defendant, without good cause, brought a anxiety following F.

3. On the same day, at around 02:30 on the same day, the Defendant immediately fleded even if he reported 112 that the Defendant would act on the spot as set forth in paragraph (2) and discovered the police box belonging to the Changwon Police Station at the Changwon Police Station at the site and asked him to stop.

I got away from the Defendant’s residence and personal information. However, the Defendant, without having given any answer, escaped again without having given any answer, and I concealed the Defendant again, resulting in the Defendant’s residence and personal information, but the Defendant did not answer again.

Since I could not confirm the residence and personal information of the defendant, the defendant assaulted the defendant as a flagrant offender, such as a violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D, I, and J;

1. Each statement K and F;

1. A report on investigation;

1.Each.

arrow