beta
Text
Defendant
A 1-year imprisonment and suspension of qualifications for crimes of 1-A, and crimes of 2-year.
Reasons
A. In light of the case of the head of another LO team, even if the person in charge indicates his status as a member of the NIS, the name is ordinarily known (in addition to the above list, the name of the sender is indicated in all “the sender” except CG). This appears to be a way of normal performance of duties due to the nature of the intelligence organization. However, it conforms to the empirical rule to view that the status of the NIS employee is also indicated if the name was indicated otherwise.
In addition, since one CG revealed all its principal name and status to the LG head of the LG team organized in the light of 2009 (305, 7, 6032 pages each time), it is reasonable to view that the Defendant D, who takes charge of the similar time, has expressed all its principal name and status.
③ In light of the developments leading up to the interference with Defendant D as the L Team leader, Defendant D seems to have known that CG et al. was an employee of the NIS.
Defendant D’s protocol attached to Defendant D’s internal report (No. 3 and No. 1, page 33) states that “the time of activity: July 2008 (former A Office 08.7.08.12.08.12.00)”.
In other words, Defendant D seems to have been transferred to G in connection with other departments within the NIS, not from the beginning the L Team leader organized for the purpose of cyber activities of the G group, but from the beginning.
This is known to Defendant D as the L Team leader created under the direction of 1 week with the job as appropriate in the upper part.
“A” is also consistent with I’s statement.
Defendant
D As a result of the CL University, at the election of the CM presidential president, the Y candidate’s CN special alert, the COP CP policy vice-chairperson, etc. were carried out, and was granted a position as a consultant of the CP committee (the 822, 17, 2245, 104, 29, and 45877, monthly). In light of these circumstances, Defendant D appears to have received monetary support in connection with the NIS at the debate level based on the presidential election.
④ Cyber. ordered by Defendant D.