1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The authenticity of the document is presumed to have been established on the ground that there is no dispute over the stamp image of Gap's evidence No. 1 (a sales contract, the name of the defendant, and the following stamp image. The defendant asserted that Byung, upon receiving the plaintiff's order, made a false statement that it is necessary to change the customer, affixed the defendant's seal and affixed the defendant's seal without regard to the content of this document, but there is no evidence to acknowledge it), Gap evidence No. 2, Eul evidence No. 1, and 5, respectively, in full view of the purport of the pleadings in the whole, the plaintiff shall be paid 20,000 shares issued by Byung (the previous trade name was changed to the trade name as of March 14, 2012, but the previous trade name was changed to the trade name as of March 14, 2012) and was the shareholder of D and the representative director of D, the plaintiff and the defendant sold all rights and obligations to manage the facilities and assets of D, and the defendant shall be paid 500,000,000 won of G grain,5 billion won to the plaintiff.

However, there is no assertion by the plaintiff as to the fact that the plaintiff and the defendant confirmed the amount and the payment date of the balance by conducting an actual inspection on the assets and liabilities of D Co., Ltd.

Therefore, the Defendant’s obligation to pay the remainder under the above sales contract was not due.

Therefore, the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim.