logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.05.04 2018노722
사기
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

1. The sentence imposed by the lower court (six months of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. According to the records of this case’s ex officio determination, the court below: (a) served a copy of indictment and a writ of summons by means of serving public notice pursuant to Article 23 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings and served the defendant with a trial in the absence of the defendant; (b) alleged to the purport that the defendant was unable to receive a copy of indictment, etc. and was unaware of the fact that the judgment was pronounced; and (c) on the ground that the defendant did not appeal within the appeal period due to a cause not attributable to the defendant

According to the above facts of recognition, there are grounds for a request for retrial under the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Litigation due to the lack of reasons attributable to the defendant who was unable to attend the trial of the court below, and accordingly, this court has tried to proceed with a new litigation procedure to the defendant, so the judgment of the court below is

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court below is reversed pursuant to Article 364 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Act without examining the defendant's unfair argument of sentencing, since there is a ground for reversal ex officio as above, and the judgment below is reversed, and it is again decided as follows.

[Grounds for a new judgment] The summary of facts constituting an offense and evidence admitted by the court and the summary of the evidence are added to the column of evidence of the judgment of the court below, and except for deletion of the "police interrogation protocol against the defendant" as stated in the corresponding column of the judgment of the court below, thereby admitting it as it is in accordance with Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. The victim’s reasons for sentencing selective imprisonment with prison labor are completely recovered.

arrow