Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

At around 21:50 on October 13, 2018, the Defendant used the intersection of three lanes in front of Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, at a speed that is impossible to find out after driving the C bus at a one-lane radius from the scarcity to the scarcity.

At the time, there was a duty of care to make an internship only in the area where the driver of the vehicle is allowed to find a front and rear vision in the intersection where a signal, etc. of three-lanes is installed at night and at the latest at the latest, and the traffic volume is high.

Nevertheless, while the Defendant neglected this and fleded in a zone in which the U.S. is prohibited from a U.S., the Defendant failed to immediately stop the said vehicle and to take necessary measures, such as providing personal information, even though he/she destroyed the said vehicle to cover approximately KRW 9,526,90 in total on the rear part of the bus side of the Defendant, by shocking the part of the victim D's car parked in the same direction two-lane.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Results of the reproduction and viewing of black boxes and video CDs;

1. Statement of the occurrence of each traffic accident in D and E;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Written estimate of repair;

1. Vehicle photographs;

1. Investigation Report (Evidence List No. 4) [Defendant and defense counsel] asserts that there is no criminal intent to escape because part of the passengers, who were aboard 30 passengers on the tourist bus at the time, did not recognize shock or sound as having known the accident in this case because they did not know the location of destination, etc. as they did not recognize shock or sound. However, according to (1) the instant accident occurred in the U.S. where the Defendant was an illegal intern in the U.S. prohibition zone, and (2) according to the result of the video play-up viewing of the damaged vehicle and the Defendant bus, the accident cannot be deemed to be negligible because the damaged vehicle and the Defendant bus were sufficiently sound, and the bus operated by the Defendant was considerably damaged, and the degree of damage to the damaged vehicle and the bus operated by the Defendant was considerably damaged.