logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.11.03 2017가단53240
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The Defendant shall deliver to the Plaintiff the real estate indicated in the attached list, and deliver the said real estate from November 16, 2016.

Reasons

1. Indication of claim;

A. The Plaintiff is the owner and lessor of the real estate listed in the attached list (hereinafter “instant real estate”).

On October 15, 2016, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) with the Defendant and the instant real estate with the terms that the deposit for lease was not specified, and that the lease was made by setting the monthly rent of KRW 850,000, and the term of lease from October 15, 2016 to November 15, 2016 (1 month).

B. As the Defendant did not pay two or more vehicles, the Plaintiff notified the Defendant of the payment of the overdue rent, etc. by content-certified mail, and notified the Defendant of the termination of the instant lease agreement on the ground of the overdue rent.

Accordingly, the Defendant continues to occupy the instant real estate without complying with the Plaintiff’s request for delivery even though the instant lease contract had been terminated.

C. Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to deliver to the Plaintiff the real estate indicated in the separate sheet, and pay to the Plaintiff the rent or unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent calculated at the rate of KRW 850,000 per month from November 16, 2016 to the completion date of delivery of the said real estate.

2. Judgment by public notice of applicable provisions of Acts (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act);

arrow