(영문) 수원지방법원평택지원 2016.01.08 2015가합9167

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원평택지원 2016.01.08 2015가합9167

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B: (a) from October 16, 2014 to KRW 15,00,000; (b)

B. Defendant C shall be KRW 8,000,000, and

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. (i) The Plaintiff and E were married on December 26, 1997, and the Plaintiff and E completed the marriage report again on July 14, 2014 after the divorce on June 30, 2014, and they were children F, G, and H, and on the family relations register, I are registered as the natural father of the Plaintiff and E.

B. The Plaintiff, however, heard the words that E gave birth to I through Defendant B and C, examined the genes of himself and I, and received the results of the genetic test on August 1, 2014 that no father-child relationship is established between the Plaintiff and I.

On August 28, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a divorce lawsuit against E (U.S. District Court Decision 2014ddan3203). On the other hand, the Plaintiff filed a complaint against E and the wounded.

x) On March 11, 2015, between the Plaintiff and the Defendant on March 11, 2015, “The Plaintiff and E shall be divorced. E shall pay the Plaintiff consolation money of KRW 50 million, and shall be paid in installments at the end of every 50 months from April 30, 2015 to May 31, 2019. The principal of the case F, G, and H’s person in parental authority and custodian shall be designated as the Plaintiff, and the person in parental authority and custodian of the principal of the case I shall be designated as E.

B. In the case where the Plaintiff of Defendant C, B, and E’s wrongful act filed an accusation against Defendant B and C, the Prosecutor Park Jong-hee of the Suwon District Prosecutors’ Office rendered a non-prosecution on March 9, 2015 on the grounds that the statute of limitations for prosecution has expired for each of the aforementioned Defendants and E’s criminal charges, and thus, the statute of limitations has expired, thereby not constituting an offense in accordance with the Constitutional Court’s decision on punishment for adultery.

(1) Defendant C knew of the fact that he had a spouse, and had sexual intercourses with E several times from the beginning of April 2009 to the beginning of August 2013, 2013.

Sheet Defendant B, knowing that he had a spouse, shall be regularly and regularly E from April 25, 2012 to September 2013.

유사 판례

-부산가정법원 2016.2.5.선고 2014드단25562 판결

-부산가정법원 2015.3.24.선고 2014드단9249 판결

-춘천지방법원원주지원 2015.02.03 2014가단7925

-대전지방법원 2015.03.11 2014가단226779

-부산가정법원 2016.2.19.선고 2015드단204577 판결