logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.06.08 2015나1996
수리비등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed.

2. All costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is engaged in mid-term leasing business under the trade name of “D”, Defendant B was the chief of the Working Group, and Defendant C was working in D as a mid-term engineer.

B. On March 27, 2014, Defendant C, while performing the maintenance work of the Plaintiff’s Incheon Airport (DHP70 F; hereinafter “instant mid-term”) at the warehouse located in Defendant B and the Namdong-gu Incheon (hereinafter “instant mid-term”) on March 27, 2014, Defendant C, without discovering the iron plates set up on the front of the instant mid-term period, was in the middle-term learning, and the said mid-term engine cover was damaged (hereinafter “instant accident”).

C. On April 8, 2014, the Plaintiff discovered an engine engine engine engine engine while using the instant heavy machine at the Sungdong site and paid 8.8 million won of repair costs, such as replacement costs of engine parts.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 2, Eul evidence 6-1, 2, Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Judgment on the plaintiff's claim

A. The Defendants asserted that the Plaintiff did not notify the Plaintiff of the instant accident even though they had a duty to report the instant incident to the Plaintiff in the event of an accident at the site of an article of the mid-term and the Working Group, and did not notify the Plaintiff of the instant accident. As the engine cover was damaged and the engine cover of the mid-term engine of the instant accident was fasted into a pipe with the engine load of 1/2 cream, and the engine inside the engine was fasted. The Plaintiff, who was unaware of the said fact, was in the process of operating the instant engine at the Sung-dong site and preparing for the work, caused a pipe to have the engine fall short of a proper fall short of the pipe due to the hole generated by the pipe. In addition, 4 million won (200,000 won x 202 days x 2 days) was incurred due to the Plaintiff’s failure to use the instant engine during the two days.

Therefore, the defendants are jointly and severally liable to compensate the plaintiff for each of the above damages.

arrow