logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.10.15 2014고단6318
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of two years and four months, and Defendant B, respectively, shall be punished by imprisonment of six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud at the Incheon District Court on December 29, 2008, and the execution of the sentence was terminated at the Incheon Detention House on January 6, 2009, and on October 14, 2014, the judgment was finalized on February 26, 2015. Defendant B was sentenced to one year and two months of imprisonment for fraud at the same court on February 7, 2014. Defendant B was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution for ten months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Incheon District Court on February 7, 2014.

around 14:00 on July 27, 2011, Defendant A paid 150 million won as down payment to the financial institution on August 17, 2011, the remainder of KRW 1150 million on the condition that he/she will receive the above conference on September 15, 201; first, at the office of the Licensed Real Estate Agent in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, the victim J, the victim J determined the purchase price of the “Lel” of the first floor and the third floor on the ground, in total of KRW 1.3 billion on the part of the victim J, Nam-gu, Incheon, which is the victim’s ownership; first, at the office of the Licensed Real Estate Agent; second, at the time of purchasing the above conference on September 15, 2011, Defendant A purchased the remainder of the down payment amount of KRW 150 million on the condition that he/she will receive the down payment of KRW 250 million on the part of the creditor; second, the creditor is the defendant and the maximum debt amount of KRW 2500 million on the remainder.

However, in fact, the defendant's repayment of the existing debt amounting to KRW 60 million against the above M and the victim tried to obtain the right of collateral security for personal use from the victim, and there was no sufficient means to obtain the right of collateral security, and there was no intention or ability to purchase the above Maur because there was no real estate that can be jointly provided with the above Maur, and there was no intention or ability to cancel the above Maur where purchase is not possible.

Nevertheless, in the above office around July 27, 201, Defendant A, at the above office, entered into a telecom sales contract and a telecom sales contract.

arrow