logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2016.10.28 2016고단2111
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From September 1, 2014 to June 22, 2016, the Defendant: (a) provided the facilities for settling a shower and shower in the trade name, and (b) operated a marina business; (c) provided 120,000 won for female employees D, etc., who found the said business; and (d) caused them to do a similar sexual intercourse in order to cause female employees D, etc. to engage in the circumstances of maths, sexual intercourses, and scam and scams by hand with the math and scambling of the said business.

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts such as arranging commercial sex acts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to internal investigation reports, records of seizure and copies of seized articles;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense and the punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of recommendations according to the sentencing guidelines (the scope of recommendations) and the basic area (six months to one year and four months) of the types of sexual traffic crimes subject to at least 19 years of age and the mediation, etc. of sexual traffic (the mediation, etc. of sexual traffic due to the receipt, payment, etc. of remuneration).

2. Sentencing factors that are disadvantageous to the decision of sentencing: The sentencing factors that are favorable to the decision of sentencing: the defendant is against the same kind of fine: the defendant has no record of punishment exceeding the fine yet; the defendant is willing not to operate again after the closure of a sexual traffic business in this case; and the defendant has taken comprehensive account of various sentencing conditions shown in the arguments and records of this case, such as the defendant's age, motive for committing the crime, scale of business and profits, etc., and the decision of sentencing shall be

arrow