Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, with respect to Defendant A, the above punishment shall be imposed for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A, as a member of the clan for the laver, the laver, the laver, the laver, the laver, and the laver, had the intention to sell the clan land at his discretion;

Defendant

B From July 28, 2011 to September 9, 2011, A drafted a written resolution to the effect that “A shall have the representative A delegate delegate all acts following the application for ownership transfer registration on the following real estate, and shall sign and seal all the members present at the meeting.” “The number change due to the registration conversion and division on October 25, 201: E, F, G)” and “E, F, and F, H of the confirmed person H”.

In addition, Defendant A merely stated that the resolution was necessary to receive compensation from the above head of H, and the fact of the sale was affixed to H’s seal, which was received from H from the hidden bond H, on the side of the H’s name in the resolution.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, Defendant A forged a letter of resolution in the name of H, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

2. On October 28, 201, Defendant A entered false information in the events of the above investigation documents and the public electronic records into the registration division of the Cheongju District Court located in Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, and the fact that the registration was submitted by a certified judicial scrivener who knows the fact that there was no legitimate resolution of the clan in relation to the delegation of the sale and purchase of each land of the E, F, and G, even though he did not pass the resolution, he had the certified judicial scrivener who knows the fact submit the registration application documents, such as the forged resolution.

Accordingly, the registry official who is aware of the fact was computerized into the land register of the above E so that each ownership transfer registration based on sale and purchase on September 9, 201 can be made in the first future in the land register of the F and G.

As a result, Defendant A exercised a forged resolution, and made a false report to a public official to record false facts in the land register which is the same electronic record as the original copy of a notarial deed.

3. Events such as false statements and electromagnetic records; and