The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal - The lower court’s imprisonment is too heavy.

2. There is no change in circumstances in the trial concerning the sentencing of the judgment, and the lower court has already determined the punishment by fully taking account of all circumstances that the Defendant already asserted as the grounds for appeal.

In particular, in 2016, the Defendant was punished by a fine due to a violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, not only one year but also takes part in the instant crime, and even if the instant crime was organized and the victims suffered considerable damage, the damage was not recovered. In full view of the sentencing grounds cited by the lower court and other factors of sentencing indicated in the records of the instant case, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, and the background of the instant crime, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable and does not seem to have exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion in sentencing.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.