The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In fact, the Defendant merely received additional costs and accommodation costs for drinking alcohol outside the two-lanes from male customers, and did not engage in an act of arranging sexual traffic at a F amusement shop operated by the Defendant.

B. The sentence of the lower court (an amount of four million won) that is unfair in sentencing is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The lower court’s determination on the assertion of mistake of facts is based on the evidence duly admitted and investigated, namely, ① the F Entertainment G of the F Entertainment Group’s regular business G is to ask male customers who are studio-led to “whether to use a arche, and whether to think of it up to the second time,” and the second cost is to be KRW 400,000,000 including a furcing car, and the second cost is to be KRW 250,000,000,000,000,000,000.

D. D. S. S. S. S. 650,00 won in cash, and will be paid up to 600,000 won.

'' The purport was that a male guest interested in the drinking value. ② A male guest paid a total of KRW 5.80,00 with the drinking value and the second expenses, and followed by a man’s employee H and drinking, and singing to H, which is an employee of the Republic of Korea. Then, a female guest made a speech, followed by singing to H, and moved to the telecom located on the upper floor of the same building as H with the guidance of the main place, ③ “A carccc ch through the second expenses, etc.” generally used for a sex relationship with female employee at an entertainment place in terms of the term referring to the sex relationship with the female employee at the entertainment place. ④ The second expenses are determined separately from the drinking value, and the process was naturally followed by the male customer to move to the entertainment and female employee, and the defendant’s assertion that the female employee of the main place of entertainment and the defendant’s assertion of sexual traffic had no reason to recognize the facts of sexual traffic.

B. The conditions of sentencing do not change compared to the first instance court’s determination on the unfair argument of sentencing, and the first instance sentencing is discretionary.