The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

On August 29, 2016, at around 10:00, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s management work by force by unilaterally cutting electricity and water supply, which are supplied as G tenniss managed by the victim F (58 tax).

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A written statement of the complainant;

1. The complaint, the 2016Kahap 80694, the written agreement for the application for reconciliation prior to the filing of the suit [the defendant and his defense counsel], the victim did not return the table of this case notwithstanding the request for withdrawal and surrender lawsuit over a long-term period of the tenant representative meeting. The defendant, as the chairperson of the tenant representative meeting, inevitably led to the suspension and fractional measures of this case through the resolution of the tenant representative meeting, sufficient advance notice, etc. under inevitable circumstances where the correction order, etc. is issued by the competent authority. Thus, considering the circumstances, the defendant's act is reasonable and reasonable in light of social norms.

According to each evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, the occupant representative meeting was issued by the Seocho-gu Office around April 7, 2016 a corrective order for the suspension of the lease and operation of the tennis and restoration from the original state. On July 19, 2016, a resolution for the suspension of the operation of the tennis and the suspension of fractional measures was passed, and on August 5, 2016.

8. Until 22.2, it is recognized that the victim notified the victim of the suspension of power or suspension of power or suspension of power or suspension of power or the suspension of power or suspension of power or suspension of water.

However, from January 2016, the council of occupants' representatives and the victim consulted several times with regard to smooth return of the instant table from around January 201 to around November 30, 2016, the parties agreed to extend the previous lease agreement by November 30, 2016, and the parties agreed to order the restoration of the table to the original state by the same date.